Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

ONS Omnibus Survey, March 1999

Variable Details

VariableSPEC13
LabelRECORD ANSWER
Responses
21 years experience dealinf with salaries and wagese 1
Because they are national figures and they should really be by area as different areas have different averages 1
Big earners are down south 1
Did not believe the figures 1
Dont take into account the different amounts of tax and NI payments people have to make 1
From own knowledge of friends' and families' salaries. is lower than what they say the average is 1
Higher earners are included with lower earners, does not give a balanced view of earnings 1
I believe it 1
I dont have enough knowledge of the big picture 1
I feel whats published is way out, about o100 above reality 1
Just what they say on t.v. /employers will say if staff are not happy with job wages they can go elsewhere 1
Lot of companies are not prepared to pay 1
Lot of people now on minimum wage now distorts figures. Also thinks figures are above what is actually being earned generally. 1
National average earnings a lot less than inflation - fixed by government. National min. wage brought in to reduce govt outgoings 1
Not 100% sure on method of collection but figures don't seem to be right. 1
Not comparing like with like i.e. Men & woman 1
Not forward looking and not taking account seasonal pay rounds 1
People can earn more than what they say - emphasis is on lowest paid not the centre or highest paid 1
People earn different amounts each month or each week depending on the amount of overtime that's there for them. 1
Personal experience 1
Rates of interest effect the figures and not adjusted on a timely basis. 1
Some earning more and some earning less-unfair that flattened average wage doesn't take into account of the large numbers on small wages versus the few on very high wages-the average is not balanced. 1
Sometimes they seem to be correct and sometimes wildly inaccurate - not deliberately misleading 1
Taking higher paid into account as well as those on low pay - distorts 1
Taking too many top execs salaries into account- unbalances and unfair to low paid 1
There are differences between places like London and Manchester, where there are different prices in different regions. 1
There are no comparisons any more. My neighbour earns 1000 pounds per week another earns 150 pounds.rns 1
a lot of people dont come into it 1
always higher than most people I know earn 1
average does not give true picture 1
average doesn't reflect reality 1
average earnings can be boosted be people on ridciulously high earnings 1
average earnings not really a meaningfull amount. 1
averages dont work in this instance 1
because i do not believe they do a broard enough range 1
because its average somebody could be earning really hihh 1
because of recent publicity about figures 1
because ofwhat'shappened overlast 6months 1
because there's lot of them fiddling the bloody dole office! 1
because they are no as sensitive as they could be 1
because they give the figures for the higher earners 1
because unemployment is high here and wages are low 1
because vast sums earned by some and who have own 70% and small income earned by many especally the young people 1
because we think we are average but it doensnt seem to be what the govt says is average 1
depends on how they select 1
depends on which industry where located and age of persons 1
depends which part of the country you are in 1
do not understand how they get the figures of what the average family is eanring 1
does not konw anyone locally whose waeg equals the wage figure given 1
doesn't reflect the vast differences in the basic wages 1
done as a country as a whol and not area by area 1
dont include basic grades 1
dont reflect ave person 1
dont think they include certain jobs and workers e.g. part time 1
earnings vary so much in different areas of uk that average earnings means little 1
eg Govt says nurses pay improved today's papers reprot they are o50 worse off. 1
go by whats happening in london not manchester 1
government tells you a figure and I do not know people on that 1
great barrier between north and south / 1
high earners distorts the figures to be higher than they really are 1
high wage earners biase results 1
i look at what i earn and what others earn and base it on that 1
i suppose we get a good idea from the figures 1
i think its over a lot of peoples heads, a lot of people dont understand average earnings 1
if you are on the top of the scale or the bottom the middle figure is misleading 1
impossible to produce figures that cover everything 1
interpretation 1
it's impossible to create 'average' earnings, the figures don't specify average for whom? It is not possible to calculate for across the board 1
knowledge of people you know adn what they earn 1
less politically sensitive 1
locol wage about 100o/wk 1
more work money/etc below watford gap/relatives in s/east 1
most of the people i know earn less than the average 1
most people earn less than the average.Figures are skewed by small number of high earners 1
need to have some figures to work with 1
never used them 1
no such thing as average earnings, they vary from industry to industry 1
not a good guide as other taxes etc gone up. 1
not always accurate 1
not applicable to an average individual 1
not correct 1
not correct for scotland 1
not everything taken into account such as free accomodation 1
not high enough 1
not sure that they're realistic 1
not typical in my experience 1
nothing further to say 1
only giving what happens in london 1
overall averages are not meaningful 'cos of lge variations in pay and costs in difft areas 1
people are not honest about earnings 1
people are not honest about what they earn 1
people dont always give the truth 1
people dont give the right info 1
people in different walks of life.people who are labouring and people in engineering it is not a fair comparison 1
politicians only give you what they want 1
probably what they say is the average earning, is not what most pepole receive 1
regional figs correct, national misleading 1
regional inaccuracies 1
see a lot of people, young people, qualified but without jobs. 1
some earnings are undeclared 1
some of the labouring people and unskilled earn much less 1
some people earn a huge amount of money and so this affects the average wage 1
some people get more and some get less so theyre average figures 1
there are people at one end of the scale and people with much higher earnings at the other, which makes the average look high 1
there are some poor people who do not get enough to live on 1
there's more lower paid than higher paid 1
they are taken as an average throughout the whole of the country 1
they take into aqccount too much of the high level salaries which incleases the figure 1
think gvy only takes middle of the road people 1
think there are more on the lower end of the scale than the government make out 1
this is human beings are like so figures will se like that too 1
thousands on low wages in this area 1
too general / need to have avertage for ech type of occupation 1
too general and non specific 1
try to say min wage will create unemployment avergae man not paid what he is worth 1
unseen workforce 1
wages vary throughout uk and therefore no average figure 1
what other people have said about them 1
what people get is rediculous 1
when it says that a man gets over o300 a week, it's not true here 1
when you look in the papers and see average very few people are on the average it disguises the poverty at the bottom 1
yes, well, you know we belong to all works of life and listening to what they say and you get a different picture from the figures published 1
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationONS Omnibus Survey, March 1999
Interviewer InstructionsRECORD ANSWER
UniverseAdults, aged 16 or over, living in private households in Great Britain.;Adults;Households;National
SamplingMulti-stage stratified random sample
Study TypeRepeated cross-sectional study, monthly (up to year 2000), 8 cycles per year thereafter.