I dont think it would bring the jobs people think |
|
1 |
INCREASE the numbers of people generally coming into the area |
|
1 |
INTERRUPTION ESPECIALLY IN THE SUMMER WHEN OUT IN THE GARDEN |
|
1 |
IT WOULD PROBLY BE PAID FOR BY TAX PAYERS SO COULD POSSIBLY EFFECT ME PERSONALLY |
|
1 |
MORE AIR TRAFFIC |
|
1 |
MORE CHANCE OF ACCIDENTS, PLANE COULD BLOW UP OVER YOUR HEAD |
|
1 |
MORE DRUGS WOULD ENTER COUNTRY THRO THEAIRPORT |
|
1 |
Mobile phone interference. |
|
1 |
No local airport |
|
1 |
Possibility of air disasters |
|
1 |
Safety of increased air traffic |
|
1 |
Security risks and chances of accident increased |
|
1 |
The prices would go up-fares. |
|
1 |
Threat dangerous |
|
1 |
Would lose village as result of new runway |
|
1 |
Wouldn't like them to fall out of sky |
|
1 |
a lot more places in the flight path |
|
1 |
access |
|
1 |
accidents |
|
1 |
airspace congestion |
|
1 |
alter the area altogether with building |
|
1 |
break up peace of countryside |
|
1 |
brikng more social hours for people working there |
|
1 |
building disruption |
|
1 |
cost and the room to accomodate |
|
1 |
cost to do it |
|
1 |
could be further away |
|
1 |
delays in checking in /daughting if travelling alone |
|
1 |
demolishing a local church and local buildings |
|
1 |
demolition of eople's homes to make way for a runway. |
|
1 |
demolition of houses. |
|
1 |
depends whether they knock down good homes |
|
1 |
disadvantages for local people. |
|
1 |
disadvantages to residents in the area |
|
1 |
disrupt peoples lives dangerous to people who live near crashing in my opinion |
|
1 |
disruption from building works |
|
1 |
early morning flights overhead would increase |
|
1 |
expense security |
|
1 |
fear of crashes or blown up by a bomb |
|
1 |
greater amount of assylum seekers escaping to track down |
|
1 |
greater risk of plane accidents |
|
1 |
higher risk of aircraft crashing or terroist incident |
|
1 |
higher security risk |
|
1 |
homes removed |
|
1 |
i don't think its needed, what is there is quite sufficient |
|
1 |
increase prices to amenities |
|
1 |
increase tourism, increase risk of accidents |
|
1 |
it will be busier at the airport |
|
1 |
it would bring more people to cornwall and wouldn't necessarily be good for a place that rely on its scenery |
|
1 |
look of the area |
|
1 |
loss of jobs if airports are rationalised |
|
1 |
might increse cost of flights |
|
1 |
more accidents |
|
1 |
more air traffic |
|
1 |
more asylum seekers |
|
1 |
more built up |
|
1 |
more chance of air crash |
|
1 |
more congestion in the sky above my property which threatens me |
|
1 |
more crashes; it is all commercally based. |
|
1 |
more of a security risk |
|
1 |
more people |
|
1 |
more people sitting around waiting |
|
1 |
more people would come to the area |
|
1 |
more peripheral development and more roads |
|
1 |
more planes flying over |
|
1 |
more pollution and corruption |
|
1 |
more risk of hijacking and crashes with more planes flying/more pressure on air space |
|
1 |
more traffic overhead, congestion all round |
|
1 |
nearer to get to |
|
1 |
night flying |
|
1 |
no local airport |
|
2 |
no view on that |
|
1 |
not sure |
|
1 |
overcrowding generally |
|
1 |
overpopulation |
|
1 |
possible increase of diseases |
|
1 |
pressures on local housing |
|
1 |
property demolished |
|
1 |
safety |
|
1 |
secuity problems and a potential accident |
|
1 |
security |
|
2 |
security problem |
|
1 |
security problems |
|
1 |
security problems illegal immigrants |
|
1 |
security problems increase and risk of more accidents around airports |
|
1 |
shake the tiles off the roof |
|
1 |
take business from other airports |
|
1 |
taking up land/that could be used for building or roads/- |
|
1 |
taking up more ground |
|
1 |
taking up more space |
|
1 |
taking up valuable land and space |
|
1 |
the number of houses being knocked down |
|
1 |
too many planes over South Wales |
|
1 |
too many tourists |
|
1 |
train journey to work would be more crowded |
|
1 |
unpleasant for residents nearby |
|
1 |
views beeing spoilt in the countryside |
|
1 |