| "NEW WORKING CLASSES" PREDOMINATE IN NEWTOWNS-MANY ONE PARENT FAMILIES TOO |
|
3 |
| + 10% UNEMPLOYED OR NO INFO. + 2% RETIRED (3) OR STUDENT (1) |
|
7 |
| +/- 10% ALL CATEGORIES |
|
1 |
| 1.ALL VERY SUPPORTIVE 2.COMPARED WITH OTHER GRAMMAR SCHOOLS WE SEEM LOW ON PROFESSIONAL BUT ON THE WHOLE PARENTS OCCUPATION DOES NOT SEEM IMPORTANT |
|
3 |
| 10% UNEMPLOYED |
|
4 |
| 13% NO DETAILS |
|
5 |
| 2 ESTATES WHICH FORM CATCHMENT AREA CLEARLY "WORKING CLASS" |
|
4 |
| 20% THE REST. |
|
6 |
| 20% UNEMPLOYED |
|
6 |
| 25% OUT OF WORK |
|
6 |
| 3% HOUSEWIVES. DIFFICULT TO CATEGORISE EG BUILDER RUNNING OWN BUSINESS - INCLUDED IN SKILLED MANUAL |
|
4 |
| 30 |
|
4 |
| 30% UNEMPLOYED |
|
4 |
| 30-35% FROM SERVICE FAMILIES MAINLY FROM SPECIALIST UNITS. |
|
9 |
| 32% UNEMPLOYMENT ON OUR PARTICULAR ESTATE (APPROX 1/3 INTAKE) |
|
5 |
| 50% OF CHILDREN COME FROM COUNCIL ESTATE IN DORMITORY SUBURB |
|
1 |
| 50% OF PUPILS FROM RURAL AREA - AGRICULTURE & RELATED WORK ARE IMPORTANT EMPLOYERS |
|
2 |
| 60% MALE UNEMPLOYMENT IN CATCHMENT AREA |
|
1 |
| 60% OF PUPILS FROM LARGE OVERSPILL COUNCIL ESTATE |
|
9 |
| 60% OF THE MALES IN OUR AREA ARE UNEMPLOYED |
|
3 |
| 80% OF FATHERS ARE UNEMPLOYED IF THEY ARE PRESENT IN FAMILY |
|
1 |
| 80% SKILLED/SEMI-SKILLED OR UNSKILLED. |
|
1 |
| 85% PUPILS CAME FROM 2 AREAS FORMALLY DESCRIBED AS SERIOUSLY DISADVANTAGED |
|
4 |
| 90% OF BOARDERS PARENTS FROM ARMY/NAVY/AIR FORCE |
|
2 |
| A CONSIDERABLE NUMBER ARE SELF-EMPLOYED |
|
3 |
| A GUESSTIMATE |
|
4 |
| A HIGH PROPORTION OF FARMERS LISTED AS SKILLED MANUAL WORKER |
|
1 |
| A LARGE % ARE UNEMPLOYED |
|
2 |
| A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF PARENTS ARE INVOLVED IN FARMING EITHER ON OWNERS OR TENANT FARMERS |
|
3 |
| A LARGE PERCENTAGE OF PARENTS IS UNEMPLOYED |
|
2 |
| A LARGE PREPONDERANCE OF AGRICULTURAL JOBS IN THIS AREA |
|
5 |
| A MINING AREA |
|
1 |
| A MIXTURE - NO MEANS OF OBTAINING PERCENTAGES. |
|
3 |
| A NUMBER OF PARENTS COMMUTE TO SENIOR POSTS IN LONDON |
|
4 |
| A PROBABLE EMPHASIS ON SKILLED MANUAL ONE WARD WITHIN CATCHMENT AREA HAS 19% UNEMPLOYMENT BUT IN REALITY 75% WORKING |
|
2 |
| A PURE GUESS! |
|
8 |
| A RURAL AREA - HORTICULTURE CHIEFLY/ENGINEERING INDUSTRY 10 MILES AWAY |
|
3 |
| A VERY MIDDLE CLASS AREA |
|
4 |
| A VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE |
|
5 |
| ABOUT 'AVERAGE' OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER. |
|
5 |
| ABOUT 25% ARE LEA PLACE HOLDERS - CAN OFFER NO USEFUL FIGURE |
|
1 |
| ACCOUNTED BY FEES |
|
1 |
| ACCURATE INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE |
|
6 |
| AGAIN - VERY MUCH AN ESTIMATE |
|
3 |
| AGAIN A VERY ROUGH APPROXIMATION |
|
1 |
| AGAIN APPROXIMATE IN THE EXTREME |
|
1 |
| AGAIN VERY DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE |
|
5 |
| AGRIC.AREA. MANY FARMWORKERS - MANY OF WHOM ARE HIGHLY SKILLED |
|
5 |
| ALOT ARE SELF-EMPLOYED. RUNNING HOTELS |
|
4 |
| ALTHOUGH WE DRAW FROM THE WHOLE OF THIS LEA OUR INTAKE IS INFLUENCED MORE FROM THE EAST MORE "WORKING CLASS" AREA. |
|
2 |
| AN "ESTIMATE" |
|
2 |
| AN AREA WHICH IS WITHIN EASY COMMUTING DISTANCE OF LONDON |
|
1 |
| AN ESTIMATE WOULD BE TOTAL GUESS WORK. |
|
6 |
| AN IMPOSSIBLE GUESS |
|
7 |
| AN INBALANCE INTAKE WHICH IS BECOMING MORE BALANCED BECAUSE OF CATCHMENT ADJUSTMENTS |
|
2 |
| AN INCREASING NUMBER OF UNEMPLOYED |
|
1 |
| AN INEXACT ASSESSMENT |
|
1 |
| ANOTHER ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE QUESTION |
|
3 |
| APPROX % (LARGE % OF SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES) |
|
6 |
| APPROX 20% SERVICE CHILDREN |
|
3 |
| APPROX 25% UNEMPLOYED |
|
4 |
| APPROX 30% OF FAMILIES ARE SINGLE-PARENT FAMILIES |
|
5 |
| APPROXIMATE |
|
5 |
| APPROXIMATION ONLY |
|
5 |
| APRIL 1951 CENSUS GIVES 43% OF BOROUGH AS BEING IN PROFESSIONAL OR OTHER NON-MANUAL EMPLOYMENT |
|
7 |
| AREA HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT/INNER CITY |
|
2 |
| AREA OF HIGH AND INCREASING UNEMPLOYMENT MOVEMENT OF PROFESSIONAL/MANAGERIAL CLERICAL AND SKILLED MANUAL WORKERS FROM NEARBY URBAN AREA |
|
7 |
| AS ABOVE |
|
4 |
| AS ABOVE!! |
|
2 |
| AS THE TRADITIONAL HEAVY INDUSTRY DECLINES THE BULK OF THE POPULATION IS CHANGING FROM SKILLED MANUAL TO UNSKILLED OR SEMI-SKILLED MANUAL |
|
3 |
| ASSUMING IN EMPLOYMENT |
|
1 |
| AT LEAST 15% UNEMPLOYED |
|
2 |
| AT LEAST 25% PUPILS ARE "SINGLE PARENT" |
|
1 |
| BASED ON 1986 ENTRY. |
|
2 |
| BASED ON 50% RAMDOM SAMPLE OF LAST 3 INTAKE YEARS |
|
3 |
| BASED ON S1 |
|
2 |
| BASED ON SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF ONE YEAR INTAKE |
|
3 |
| CANNOT ANSWER |
|
3 |
| CANNOT ANSWER IN PERCENTAGE TERMS. BIAS TOWARDS LOWER SOCIO-ECONOMIC GROUPS |
|
3 |
| CANNOT ANSWER THIS |
|
1 |
| CANNOT GIVE THIS INFORMATION |
|
4 |
| CATCHMENT AREA COULD BE CLASSED AS RURAL DORMITORY TO NEARBY URBAN AREAS. GOOD HOUSING AVAILABLE. |
|
5 |
| CATCHMENT AREA HAS VIRTUALLY NO INDUSTRY/BEING A DORMITORY SUBURB |
|
3 |
| CATCHMENT AREA IS RURAL A SERVICE INDUSTRY SMARTEST TOWN WITH A DORMITORY RESIDENTIAL AREA FOR STEEL WORKERS & THEIR FAMILIES |
|
6 |
| CATCHMENT AREA LIES IN TOWN'S OLDEST ESTATES/CLOSE TO DOCKS AND HAS SEVERAL TRADITIONAL ENGINEERING BASED INDUSTRIES |
|
4 |
| CATEGORISATION IS BECOMING MORE DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF IMPACT OF NEW TECHNOLOGY |
|
2 |
| CENSUS CATEGORIES USED |
|
5 |
| CLERICAL & PROFESSIONAL ABOVE AVERAGE |
|
3 |
| COMMENTS ARE RELEVANT HERE TOO |
|
5 |
| COMPLETE CROSS-SECTION BUT ESTIMATES IMPOSSIBLE |
|
2 |
| DAY ELEMENT DRAWN FROM HOTELIER/CATERING BACKGROUNDS |
|
4 |
| DIFFICULT |
|
1 |
| DIFFICULT TO ASSESS |
|
3 |
| DIFFICULT TO ASSIGN & SCHOOL HASNT GOT INFO ON ALL PARENTS |
|
1 |
| DIFFICULT TO BE ACCURATE WHEN PARENTS - RECORD THAT THEY ARE UNEMPLOYED THEY RARELY GIVE THEIR PREVIOUS JOB IF ANY |
|
2 |
| DIFFICULT TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND GROUPS |
|
5 |
| DIFFICULTIES TO ASSESS |
|
2 |
| DO NOT HAVE THIS INFO - ANY GUESS MIGHT BE WILDLY OUT. |
|
3 |
| DONT KNOW |
|
8 |
| DONT KNOW! (IE. INFO NOT IMMED. AVAIL) |
|
3 |
| DORMITORY TOWN FOR COMMUTERS |
|
6 |
| ESTIMATION - RELIABILITY UNCERTAIN |
|
4 |
| EVEN MORE OF A GUESSTIMATE. |
|
2 |
| FAIRLY SETTLED POPULATION |
|
2 |
| FARMING AREA |
|
6 |
| FIGURES GIVEN ARE REASONED ASSESSMENTS |
|
5 |
| FIGURES NOT AVAILABLE |
|
3 |
| FIGURES REFLECT LACK OF JOB OPPORTUNITES AND LACK OF NEED FOR OLDER & TRADITIONAL SKILLS. MUST PARENTS NOT UPWARDLY ????? |
|
6 |
| FORCES = 22.5% |
|
1 |
| FROM A 3 YEAR OLD SURVEY |
|
1 |
| GENERALLY A GOOD MIX |
|
1 |
| GENERALLY SMALL FARMERS OR SMALL BUSINESSMEN |
|
1 |
| GOVERNMENT ASSISTED PLACES ARE INCREASING BOYS FROM LOWER INCOME GROUP |
|
3 |
| GUESSES ONLY |
|
2 |
| GUESSTIMATED |
|
4 |
| GUESSWORK (CANNOT BE ACCURATE) |
|
4 |
| GUESSWORK - DO NOT KEEP RECORDS AS I SEE NO REASON TO DO SO. |
|
1 |
| GUESTIMATES |
|
3 |
| HEAVILY WEIGHTED TO BOTTOM END OF PARENTAL OCCUPATION |
|
3 |
| HIGH % OF PARENTS SELF-EMPLOYED AS SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS. |
|
1 |
| HIGH LEVEL OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICE INDUSTRIES/MOTHERS WORKING. |
|
1 |
| HIGH PERCENTAGE OF SMALL HOTEL & GUEST HOUSE PROPRIETERS. |
|
1 |
| HIGH PROPORTION UNEMPLOYED SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES |
|
5 |
| HIGH REGIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT MEANS THAT SOME PARENTS HAVE NEVER WORKED |
|
4 |
| HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT |
|
2 |
| HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATE |
|
4 |
| HIGHER IN YEARS 1-4/LOWER IN YEARS 5/L6 AND U6 |
|
3 |
| I AM AFRAID THAT ANY ESTIMATE I MADE WOULD BE SO MUCH OF A GUESS THAT I AM NOT PREPARED TO ATTEMPT IT |
|
4 |
| I AM NO SOCIO-ECONOMIST & HAVE NO STATISTICS TO COMPLETE THIS |
|
2 |
| I AM UNABLE TO ESTIMATE. WE HAVE A BALANCED INTAKE TYPICAL OF A SMALL TOWN |
|
2 |
| I AM VERY UNHAPPY ABOUT THIS SECTION - MY FIGURES ARE TOTALLY ARBITRARY |
|
1 |
| I CANNOT ANSWER THIS |
|
4 |
| I CANNOT ANSWER THIS I DONT KNOW |
|
1 |
| I CANNOT ESTIMATE THE PROPORTIONS SCHOOL CATCHMENT AREA MAINLY RURAL. |
|
2 |
| I CONSULTED EXTERNAL CAREERS OFFICE ON THIS ONE. BUT END RESULT IS SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION. |
|
3 |
| I COULD NOT BEGIN TO ATTEMPT THIS |
|
4 |
| I DO NOT FEEL ABLE TO ANSWER THIS-JOBS CHANGE SO FREQUENTLY & UNEMPLOYMENT IN ALL SOCIAL CLASSES IS HIGH |
|
4 |
| I FEEL THAT THIS IS AN INAPPROPRIATE QUESTION |
|
2 |
| I FIND THIS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE. WE DO NOT SEEK SUCH KNOWLEDGED |
|
1 |
| I HADN'T TIME TO CHECK ALL RECORDS AND WE HAVENT FULL INFORMATION ON THIS MATTER |
|
7 |
| I HAVE NEVER ATTEMPTED TO CALCULATE THIS CERTAINLY THERE ARE RELATIVELY FEW IN THE 4TH CATEGORY |
|
2 |
| I HAVE NO BASIS FOR EVEN GUESSING |
|
1 |
| I HAVE NO IDEA OF PARENTS' WORK. |
|
2 |
| I HAVE NO IDEA OF THESE STATISTICS |
|
3 |
| I HAVE NO IDEA OF THIS DISTRIBUTION |
|
1 |
| I HAVE NO IDEA. INFORMATION IN THIS FORM IS NOT KEPT |
|
2 |
| I HAVE NO INFORMATION ON WHICH TO BASE AN ESTIMATE |
|
8 |
| I HAVE NO MEANS OF KNOWING ALTHOUGH I LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY. MY GUESS COULD BE QUITE MISLEADING. |
|
1 |
| I HAVE NO READILY AVAILABLE CRITERIA |
|
1 |
| I REALLY CANT GUESS |
|
9 |
| I WOULD GUESS THAT THE GREAT MAJORITY ARE SEMI-SKILLED OR UNSKILLED |
|
2 |
| I'M CLASSIFYING FORMERS AS PROFESSIONAL/MANAGERIAL |
|
1 |
| IF UNEMPLOYED WHEN STUDENTS ARRIVE AT 13+ DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE |
|
8 |
| IMPOSSIBLE APS/SESSION MEANS/POSSIBLILTY OF MANUAL WORKERS |
|
3 |
| IMPOSSIBLE QUESTION. |
|
1 |
| IMPOSSIBLE QUESTIONS |
|
2 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ANSWER IN DETAIL |
|
9 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ANSWER. |
|
2 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ASSESS - WITH ANY DEGREE OF ACCURACY MANY FROM ONE PARENT FAMILIES - SOME HAVE KNOWN 2-3 FATHERS |
|
2 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ASSESS ACCURATELY |
|
6 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO COMMENT |
|
1 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE |
|
1 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE ACCURATLEY |
|
4 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE AS WE DO NOT REQUIRE THIS INFORMATION ON ADMISSION |
|
4 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE DUE TO COMPLEXITY OF INFORMATION |
|
4 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE WHEN MANY BECOME SELF EMPLOYED |
|
2 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO GIVE ACCURATELY |
|
1 |
| IMPOSSIBLE TO SAY AS PARENTS NO LONGER HAVE TO STATE THEIR OCCUPATIONS WHEN PUPILS ENTER THE SCHOOL |
|
1 |
| INCREASING UNEMPLOYMENT AND ONE PARENT FAMILIES |
|
5 |
| INCREASING UNEMPLOYMENT IS A VERY WORRYING FACTOR |
|
2 |
| INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE |
|
3 |
| INFORMATION MUST BE AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE - WE CANNOT OFFER IT |
|
2 |
| INFORMATION N/A |
|
3 |
| INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE |
|
1 |
| INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE WITHOUT PURE GUESSWORK. REFER TO LEA |
|
4 |
| INFORMATION NOT KNOWN |
|
2 |
| INFORMATION NOT OFFICIALLY RECORDED (APPROXIMATION) |
|
6 |
| INFORMATION NOT READILY ATTAINABLE |
|
4 |
| INFORMATION NOT READILY AVAILABLE. DEGREE OF GUESSWORK INVOLVED |
|
5 |
| INFORMATION OF THIS NATURE IS NOT KEPT IN SCHOOL RECORDS |
|
3 |
| INFORMATION UNKNOWN |
|
4 |
| INSUFFICIENT DATA |
|
2 |
| INTAKE LARGELY DRAWN FROM TRADITIONALLY WORKING CLASS AREAS IN RECENT YEARS |
|
7 |
| INTUITION - CATEGORIES VARY WIDELY |
|
4 |
| IT CANNOT BE ASSUMED THAT THESE FATHERS STILL LIVE WITH THE PUPILS |
|
1 |
| IT IS SCHOOL POLICY NOT TO CONSIDER THIS ASPECT. HAS IT A RELEVANCE TO A CHILDS EDUCATION. |
|
1 |
| LARGE AREA OF SOCIAL DEPRIVATION IN SCHOOL CATCHMENT |
|
1 |
| LARGE NUMBER HOTEL/TOURIST ASSOCIATED WORKERS - LITTLE IND. |
|
3 |
| LARGE PERCENTAGE OF UNEMPLOYED AND ONE PARENT FAMILIES. |
|
1 |
| LARGELY A FARMING COMMUNITY |
|
2 |
| LARGELY AGRICULTURAL AREA |
|
2 |
| LITTLE LOCAL INDUSTRY - "COMMUTER BELT" |
|
5 |
| LOCAL WARD ECONOMICALLY ACTIVE |
|
7 |
| MAIN OCCUPATION TOURISM |
|
3 |
| MAINLY FROM OWNER OCCUPIER BELT OF HOUSES FROM 30000 POUNDS TO VERY EXPENSIVE WITH SMALL INTAKE FROM COUNCIL ESTATES |
|
1 |
| MAJORITY HOTEL/BOARDING HOUSE PROPRIETERS |
|
3 |
| MANAGERIAL INCREASING WITH DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUTING TO NEARBY URBAN CENTRES |
|
3 |
| MANY AGRICULTURAL WORKERS - RURAL ENVIRONMENT. |
|
2 |
| MANY ARE FARMERS. I DO NOT HAVE INFORMATION TO ALLOW EVEN AN APPROXIMATION |
|
3 |
| MANY ARE NOW UNEMPLOYED |
|
7 |
| MANY ARE SELF EMPLOYED OWNING SMALL SHOPS |
|
5 |
| MANY ARE UNEMPLOYED ( APPROX 35%) |
|
3 |
| MANY ARE WORKING MOTHERS |
|
1 |
| MANY EMPLOYED SEASONALLY IN HOLIDAY BUSINESS |
|
3 |
| MANY IS HOTEL & CATERING IN SEMI SKILLED CAPACITY |
|
4 |
| MANY MEMBERS OF FORCES |
|
2 |
| MANY OF THIS 48 % ARE TENANT FARMERS OR SMALL FARM OWNERS IE. 'MANGERIAL' - BUT I HAVE COUNTED THEM AS 'SKILLED MANUALS' |
|
1 |
| MANY ONE PARENT FAMILIES. MOST WOMEN HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD ARE IN SHOP/OFFICE WORK |
|
3 |
| MANY ONE-PARENT FAMILIES. |
|
5 |
| MANY PRESENT ARE UNEMPLOYED |
|
2 |
| MANY SELF EMPLOYED IN LEISURE INDUSTRIES |
|
5 |
| MANY SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES WITH MOTHERS IN CLERICAL GROUP |
|
7 |
| MANY SINGLE PARENTS/BROKEN HOMES |
|
1 |
| MANY SMALL SHOP KEEPERS & WORKERS AT AIRPORT |
|
4 |
| MANY UNEMPLOYED OR LOW WAGES |
|
1 |
| MASSIVE REDUNDANCIES/PHASED REDUNDANCIES AFTER MINERS STRIKE AND LONG TERMED UNEMPLOYED THEREFORE PROBABLY 25-30% UNEMPLOYED. |
|
5 |
| METHODIST SCHOOL - MANY PARENTS ARE CLERGYMEN |
|
3 |
| MIDDLE CLASS AREA |
|
6 |
| MINING & INDUSTRIAL AREA |
|
6 |
| MIXED |
|
1 |
| MORE GUESSED THAN ESTIMATED |
|
10 |
| MOST PARENTS AT MY SCHOOL ARE ABOVE AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE AND VOCAL - THEY HAVE TO BE TO GET THROUGH 1981 ED. ACT (TO GET STATEMENTING) |
|
1 |
| NO ADEQUATE DATA |
|
4 |
| NO FIGURES AVAILABLE |
|
4 |
| NO IDEA |
|
10 |
| NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE |
|
8 |
| NO INFORMATION COLLATED ON WHICH TO ANSWER |
|
7 |
| NO INFORMATION TO HAND |
|
3 |
| NO REAL ACCOUNT TAKEN OF ONE-PARENT FAMILIES |
|
3 |
| NO RECOLDS HELD |
|
4 |
| NO STATISTICS AVAILABLE |
|
2 |
| NO SUCH INFORMATION WOULD EVER BE SOUGHT FROM PUPILS |
|
4 |
| NO WAY OF TELLING - MOST FATHERS (IF ANY) UNEMPLOYED |
|
1 |
| NOT A FIGURE THAT I CALCULATE |
|
2 |
| NOT ABLE TO ESTIMATE |
|
1 |
| NOT ALL PARENTS GIVE EMPLOYMENT DETAILS-DIFFERENCE IN NUMBERS ARE BECAUSE INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE. |
|
1 |
| NOT AVAILABLE BUT WHEN LAST MEASURED THE SCHOOL WAS FORMED BY A GOOD DISTRIBUTION CURVE OF SOCIO ECONOMICS GROUPING |
|
5 |
| NOT BASED ON STATISTICAL EVIDENCE |
|
2 |
| NOT COUNTING 'HOUSEWIVES' - 7 IN NUMBER ARMED FORCES 14 IN NUMBER |
|
4 |
| NOT KNOWN |
|
23 |
| NOT KNOWN - THE ESTIMATE WOULD BE PURE GUESSWORK WITH 1300 PUPILS I CANNOT GO THROUGH THE RECORDS. |
|
5 |
| NOT KNOWN 6% |
|
5 |
| NOT KNOWN AS WE KEEP NO RECORDS |
|
3 |
| NOT POSSIBLE |
|
9 |
| NOT POSSIBLE ASSES |
|
3 |
| NOT SURE WHERE TO PUT MINERS AND STEEL WORKERS |
|
7 |
| NOW HAVE SOMETHING LIKE A 25% RATE OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN POCKETS OF THE CATCHMENT AREA |
|
5 |
| OCCUPATIONS OF PARENTS NOT RECORDED |
|
3 |
| OF THE GROUP SURVEYED 19% ARE SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES |
|
5 |
| OIL PLATFORM FABRICATION & RELATED ENGINEERING DOMINATES EMPLOYMENT |
|
2 |
| ONLY A ROUGH ESTIMATE! (MANY SINGLE PARENT CHILDREN) |
|
3 |
| ONLY VERY APPROXIMATE |
|
2 |
| ORIGINALLY WORKING CLASS ALL AREA - NOW COMMUTER BELT FOR NEARBY CONURBATION AND SOME NEW INDUSTRY |
|
2 |
| OTHER TWO GROUPS ONLY FRACTIONAL LARGE NUMBER OF SELF-EMPLOYED (TAXI DRIVERS FOR EXAMPLE) |
|
1 |
| OUR INTAKE IS VERY VARIED |
|
4 |
| OUR PUPILS LIVE IN AN URBAN AREA WHERE MINING AND MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY HAS GREATLY DECLINED |
|
5 |
| PERHAPS 5% UNEMPLOYED AT ANY GIVEN TIME ABOUT 20% SINGLE PARENT |
|
2 |
| PLEASE SEE REGISTRAR GENERALS FIGURES - WE TAKE IN A FAIR CROSS SECTION OF THE COMMUNITY |
|
6 |
| PLUS UNEMPLOYED 15% |
|
1 |
| PREDOMINANTLY SKILLED ARTISANS. |
|
3 |
| PROBABLY 15%-20% OF FATHERS ARE UNEMPLOYED |
|
8 |
| PROXIMITY TO BAC AND RR-MANY PARENTS EMPLOYED IN INDUSTRIES |
|
1 |
| PURE ESTIMATE |
|
1 |
| PURE GUESS! ALL I HAVE TIME FOR |
|
5 |
| PURE VALUELESS GUESSWORK. I HAVE NO INTENTION OF CHECKING. |
|
5 |
| REDUNDANCY CAUSES CHANGING OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE BUT NOT AS YET SOCIAL STRUCTURE |
|
6 |
| REFLECTED TRENDS IN BRADFORD WITH OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE WEIGHTED TO SKILLED MANUAL & SEMI SKILLED |
|
4 |
| REGRET INFORMATION UNAVAILABLE. |
|
4 |
| REMAINDER WITH MOTHER AS SINGLE PARENT/HOUSEWIFE WITH NO TRACE OF FATHER. PLEASE NOTE THAT AVERAGE PAY HERE IS WELL BELOW NATIONAL AVERAGE |
|
4 |
| REST PROBABLY UNEMPLOYED |
|
4 |
| RESULTS WOULD REPRESENT SHEER GUESS WORK |
|
3 |
| ROUGH ESTIMATE |
|
9 |
| ROUGH ESTIMATE ONLY |
|
3 |
| RURAL AREA |
|
2 |
| RURAL AREA - WITH A FEW FROM NEAREST TOWN |
|
2 |
| RURAL AREA BUT SUBSTANTIAL PROPORTION OF PROFESSIONAL FOLKS. |
|
6 |
| RURAL SURBURBAN CATCHMENT PREDOMINANT WHITE COLLAR & SKILLED |
|
4 |
| RURAL WORKING CLASS CATCHMENT AREA - OCCUPATION GROUPS DO NOT COINCIDE WITH DESCRIPTIONS GIVEN WHICH ARE 'URBAN/SUBURBAN' |
|
4 |
| SCHOOL CATCHMENT AREA IS A HOLIDY RESORT OF SOME REPUTE |
|
4 |
| SCHOOL HEAVILY WEIGHTED TO PROFESSIONAL CLASSES |
|
7 |
| SCHOOL IN A RESIDENTIAL AREA. |
|
3 |
| SCHOOL SERVES A RURAL AREA WITH FARMING COMMUNITY/A COMPACT MARKET TOWN POPULATION & THE DORMITORY AREA FOR PROF-CLASSES WORKING IN LARGER TOWNS AS |
|
1 |
| SEE ABOVE |
|
8 |
| SEE BELOW |
|
8 |
| SEE OVER |
|
7 |
| SEE Q28 |
|
4 |
| SELF EMPLOYED 15% |
|
6 |
| SERVICE INDUSTRIES PREDOMINATE |
|
9 |
| SEVERAL PARENTS ARE IN THE ARMED FORCES |
|
1 |
| SHOP OWNERS? PRIVATE BUILDERS? I HAVE CLASSIFIED BOTH AS CLERICAL & WHITE COLLAR |
|
1 |
| SKILLED MANUAL FIGURE INCLUDES FARMERS AND ANCILLARY WORKERS IN AGRICULTURAL |
|
3 |
| SOME OF THE FATHERS ARE RETIRED TO THIS AREA |
|
3 |
| SOME PUPILS FINANCED BY LEA AS SPECIAL NEEDS PUPILS |
|
1 |
| SPECULATIVE |
|
2 |
| STATISTICS NOT KEPT |
|
3 |
| SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER IN CARING PROFESSION |
|
1 |
| THE ABOVE ASSUMES THEY ARE ALL IN EMPLOYMENT I HAVE USED THE FORMER EMPLOYMENT AS INDICATOR |
|
4 |
| THE ABOVE COULD IN INACCURATE |
|
1 |
| THE CATCHMENT AREA IS RURAL AND RESIDENTIAL WITH A HIGH PROPORTION OF PROFESSIONAL AND CLERICAL PARENTS |
|
5 |
| THE EXACT DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN THE FIRST TWO CATEGORIES IS DIFFICULT |
|
1 |
| THE PROFESSIONAL/MANAGERIAL GROUP WOULD BE ON LOWER LADDER |
|
2 |
| THE REST ARE UNEMPLOYED |
|
1 |
| THE SCHOOL IS AN INNER CITY SCHOOL WITH A VERY HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT (25%+) & IS A PRIORITY AREA SCHOOL |
|
3 |
| THE SECOND ESTIMATE IS MORE LIKELY TO BE TRUE |
|
1 |
| THE VAST MAJORITY OF PARENTS FALL INTO SEMI-SKILLED/UNSKILLED MANUAL WORKERS WITH THE LATTER PREDOMINENT. IT MUST ALSO BE EMPHASISED THAT THERE IS |
|
4 |
| THERE ARE 1500+ CHILDREN HERE - POTENTIALLY 3000 PARENTS - GUESSES BASED ON KNOWLEDGE OF A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF PARENTS WELL KNOWN WOULD BE MISLEADI |
|
2 |
| THERE ARE MORE AND MORE SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES. |
|
5 |
| THERE IS A HIGH LEVEL OF UMEMPLOYMENT IN THE AREA & PROBABLY 15% ARE OUT OF WORK AT ANY ONE TIME. |
|
2 |
| THERE IS NO EVIDENCE AVAILABLE TO SUGGEST THAT THESE GUESSES HAVE ANY VALIDITY WHATSOEVER |
|
2 |
| THESE ARE VERY APPROX |
|
5 |
| THESE ESTIMATES CANNOT BE TAKEN AS RELIABLE AS FULL INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE |
|
4 |
| THESE FIGURES APPLY ONLY TO THE PRESENT S4 |
|
1 |
| THESE FIGURES ARE PROBABLY MEANINGLESS A GUESS ON MY PART |
|
1 |
| THESE FIGURES ARE VERY APPROXIMATE. |
|
8 |
| THESE FIGURES ONLY RELATE TO THOSE IN EMPLOYMENT |
|
2 |
| THESE FIGURES WOULD REPRESENT AN OPTIMISTIC VIEW IN PRESENT EMPLOYMENT SITUATION. |
|
3 |
| THESE RECORDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS SCHOOL. |
|
5 |
| THESE RESULTS ARE BASED ON A SURVEY OF ONE FORM TAKEN AT RANDOM. I HAVE NO REASON TO SUPPOSE THEY ARE ATYPICAL. |
|
2 |
| THIS CALCULATION IS BASED UPON PARENTS COMPLETING A FORM GIVING EMERGENCY CONTACT NUMBERS |
|
3 |
| THIS FIGURE IS NOT ACCURATE |
|
4 |
| THIS HAS BEEN DIFFICULT TO ASCERTAIN - % BASED ON A RANDOM SAMPLE |
|
2 |
| THIS INFO NOT STORED ON FILES AFTER STRONG ANTIPATHY BY PARENTS/TEACHERS IN 1970'S |
|
4 |
| THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ASKED FOR ON APPLICATION TO THE SCHOOL THE %'S ABOVE ARE "GUESTIMATES" |
|
4 |
| THIS INFORMATION IS NOT EASILY EXTRACTED FROM OUR FILES. A GUESSTIMATE WOULD NOT SEEM APPROPRIATE |
|
2 |
| THIS INFORMATION IS NOT READILY RETRIEVABLE |
|
2 |
| THIS IS A A SUBURBAN AREA WITH HIGH EMPLOYMENT AND HIGH PROPERTY PRICES. |
|
2 |
| THIS IS A CRUDE ESTIMATE |
|
5 |
| THIS IS A FARMING COMMUNITY |
|
1 |
| THIS IS A GUESS RATHER THAN AN ESTIMATE |
|
2 |
| THIS IS A NEW TOWN WITH AN INCREASING SUPPLY OF OFFICE JOBS AND WORK IN SMALL ENGINEERING FIRMS |
|
6 |
| THIS IS A RURAL AREA BUT MANY COMMUTERS TO URBAN CENTRES & MANY ARE INVOLVED WITH NEARBY UNIVERSITY |
|
3 |
| THIS IS A SELF-CONTAINED TOWN BUT ALSO HAS GOOD LINKS WITH NEARBY CONURBATION |
|
6 |
| THIS IS A WILD GUESS |
|
2 |
| THIS IS ALMOST GUESSWORK - WE DO NOT RECORD SUCH INFORMATION |
|
4 |
| THIS IS AN AREA OF "HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT" GENERALLY. WIDE SPREAD OF INTAKE MEANS WIDE SPREAD OF OCCUPATIONS |
|
3 |
| THIS IS AN AREA OF IMMIGRATION AND OF HIGH EMPLOYMENT |
|
6 |
| THIS IS BASED ON A ROUGH ANALYSIS OF THE RECORD CARD OF DETAILS |
|
6 |
| THIS IS ENTIRELY BASED ON INFORMED GUESSWORK. WE DO NOT KEEP FIGURES |
|
4 |
| THIS IS GUESS WORK |
|
3 |
| THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ASSESS WITH ANY ACCURACY. |
|
3 |
| THIS IS IN GENERAL AN AFFLUENT AREA AS ALSO ARE THE SURROUNDING VILLAGES. SOME PARENTS WORK IN NEARBY CONURBATION IN PROFESSIONAL/MANAGERIAL/CLERI |
|
2 |
| THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE WITH THE INFORMATION THAT IS FILED ABOUT THE PUPILS AT THIS SCHOOL |
|
4 |
| THIS IS ONLY A ROUGH ESTIMATE |
|
2 |
| THIS IS TOTALLY IMPRESSIONISTIC |
|
3 |
| THIS IS VERY APPROXIMATE. WE DO NOT HAVE THIS INFORMATION ON RECORD |
|
3 |
| THIS IS VERY MUCH A GUESS |
|
4 |
| THIS LEA HAS A LARGER THAN AVERAGE GROUP OF SEMI-SKILLED AND UNSKILLED MANUAL WORKERS |
|
4 |
| THIS REALLY GUESSWORK - BASED ON IMPRESSION AS MUCH AS ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE. |
|
6 |
| THIS REALLY IS A GUESS |
|
4 |
| THIS REFLECTS THE PROPORTION OF PEOPLE IN THE LOCAL AREA |
|
2 |
| THIS WOULD BE POINTLESS GUESSWORK OR ELSE INVOLVE CONSIDERABLE EFFORT FOR WHICH THERE IS NO TIME |
|
2 |
| TO CALL THIS AN APPROXIMATION IS GROSSLY TO EXAGERATE ITS PROBABLE ACCURACY. |
|
2 |
| TOTAL RANGE/EVERYTHING FROM WIVES' REFUGE TO DON'S DAUGHTERS |
|
3 |
| UNABLE TO ANSWER |
|
3 |
| UNABLE TO COMMENT |
|
5 |
| UNABLE TO FULLY COMMENT |
|
3 |
| UNEMPLOYED |
|
3 |
| UNEMPLOYED 20% - AREA FROM WHICH SCHOOL DRAWS PUPILS IS PREDOMINANTLY "WORKING CLASS" |
|
1 |
| UNEMPLOYED-MANY HEADS OF HOUSEHOLD ARE OFTEN ONE-PARENT FAMILIES - UNMARRIED MOTHERS |
|
5 |
| UNEMPLOYMENT NOW ABOUT 20% |
|
9 |
| UNKNOWN |
|
3 |
| UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE |
|
1 |
| URBAN OVERSPILL EFFECT |
|
7 |
| V DIFFICULT |
|
5 |
| V DIFFICULT ESPECIALLY WITH NO MONEY UNEMPLOYED |
|
8 |
| V DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE WITHOUT A LOT OF TIME |
|
2 |
| VARIES. |
|
1 |
| VARIETY REFLECTS THE MARKED DIFFERENCES IN OUR CATCHMENT AREA |
|
7 |
| VERY APPROXIMATE |
|
4 |
| VERY APPROXIMATE "GUESSTIMATE". |
|
2 |
| VERY APPROXIMATE GUESSES |
|
4 |
| VERY APPRXIMATE FIGURES |
|
5 |
| VERY DIFFICULT TO ANSWER WITH CONFIDENCE |
|
4 |
| VERY DIFFICULT TO ASSESS BECAUSE OF RE-ORGANISATION LAST SEPTEMBER |
|
1 |
| VERY DIFFICULT TO ASSESS THE ABOVE % ARE A PURE GUESTIMATE. |
|
1 |
| VERY DIFFICULT TO ESTIMATE NUMBERS |
|
1 |
| VERY HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATE |
|
3 |
| VERY LITTLE IDEA ON THIS |
|
1 |
| VERY LOW IN FIRST CATEGORY. MORE IN SECOND. MOST IN THIRD. SLIGHTLY FEWER THAN THIRD CATEGORY IN FOURTH. |
|
1 |
| VERY MUCH A CLAN 2/3/4 ARE ON CENSUS CRITERIA |
|
2 |
| VERY MUCH A GUESS |
|
11 |
| VERY MUCH A GUESTIMATE |
|
3 |
| VERY MUCH AN APPROXIMATION |
|
1 |
| VERY MUCH IN PROFESSIONAL/CLERICAL/MANAGEMENT GROUP. CANNOT/WILL NOT ESTIMATE |
|
2 |
| VERY ROUGH AND UNRELIABLE ESTIMATES |
|
1 |
| VERY ROUGH APPROXIMATION |
|
5 |
| VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE |
|
6 |
| VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE NO TIME TO TRAWL THE RECORDS OF 1000 PUPILS |
|
3 |
| VERY ROUGH ESTIMATES |
|
9 |
| VERY RURAL AREA. WITH MAJOR RAF STATION IN CATCHMENT AREA |
|
4 |
| VERY RURAL CATCHMENT AREA |
|
5 |
| VERY UNREALIABLE.ABOUT 700 FATHERS FOR 1000 PUPILS |
|
3 |
| VERY VERY MUCH GUESSWORK |
|
3 |
| WE ARE FED BY A VERY MIDDLE CLASS AREA |
|
6 |
| WE DO NOT HAVE ACCURATE INFORMATION ON THIS SUBJECT |
|
5 |
| WE DO NOT KEEP RECORDS |
|
2 |
| WE FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE TO ESTIMATE |
|
2 |
| WE HAVE A WIDE AND EQUAL RANGE - THIS HAS BEEN CHECKED BEFORE. |
|
1 |
| WE HAVE NO ACCURATE INFORMATION. A VERY ROUGH GUESS |
|
3 |
| WE HAVE NO DATA FOR QUITE A FEW AND OTHERS ARE SO VAGUE THEY WOULD MEAN ANYTHING |
|
3 |
| WE HAVE NO INFORMATION ON WHICH TO JUDGE THIS. |
|
4 |
| WE HAVE NO MEANINGFUL RECORDS AND HAVE NO WISH TO MAKE ENQUIRIES |
|
1 |
| WE HAVE NO RECORD OF THIS |
|
1 |
| WE HAVE NO RECORDS OF SUCH INFORMATION |
|
2 |
| WE HAVE NO WAY OF CHECKING 29 OR 30 OR 33 ACCURATELY. |
|
3 |
| WE HAVE TOP AND BOTOM THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE |
|
4 |
| WE NOW HAVE SOME UNEMPLOYED PARENTS WHOSE CHILDREN CAN BE HELPED WITH ASSISTED PLACES (SEE BELOW) |
|
6 |
| WE SERVE A LARGE R.A.F. BASE. |
|
1 |
| YEAR 3-5 (SEE Q28 ABOVE) 1ST 2 GROUPS LESS WELL REPRESENTED |
|
3 |
Login