This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.

 

Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

Survey of English Housing, 2002-2003

Variable Details

Variablepha238n
LabelSATISFACTION WITH LANDLORD
Question text And taking everything into account, how satisfied are you with the services provided by your landlord?
Responses
1 Very satisfied 817
2 Fairly satisfied 625
3 Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 194
4 Slightly dissatisfied 100
5 Very dissatisfied 91
-9 Don't know (9) 23
-8 Refusal (8) 2
-4 No TG interview 32
-1 Item not applicable 113
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationSurvey of English Housing, 2002-2003
Interviewer InstructionsSHOW CARD PH. FOR SUB-TENANTS 'LANDLORD' REFERS TO THE IMMEDIATE RATHER THAN OVERALL LANDLORD.
UniversePrivate households and privately renting tenancy groups in England;Households;Housing;Tenants;National
SamplingMulti-stage stratified random sample
Study TypeRepeated cross-sectional study conducted annually from 1993/1994-2007/2008. The SEH was replaced by the EHS from 2008 (see Abstract section for details).
UKRI logo

Funded by UKRI through the ESRC with contributions from our partners.

© 2025 UK Data Service
We are supported by the University of Essex, University of Manchester, Jisc, UCL and University of Edinburgh. We are funded by UKRI through the Economic and Social Research Council.