| 15% of fathers income/ |
|
1 |
| 15% of fathers salary |
|
1 |
| 20% of your disposable income |
|
1 |
| ABOUT A PERCENTAGE OF YOUR WAGE ACCORDING TO HOW MANY KIDS YOUVE GOT / TO GET MORE MONEY OUT OF YOU |
|
1 |
| Don't know |
|
26 |
| Fixed percentage of income |
|
1 |
| I KNOW FROM OUR OWN EXP ABOUT THE CSA. THEY HAMMERED MY HUSBAND AFTER WE SEPARATED FOR ONLY 8 MNTHS. IT IS 10 YEARS SINCE THAT SEPARATION AND MY HUSBAND IS STILL PAYING BACK THE BENEFITS I RECD AT THE RATE OF £77 A WEEK. & A COLLEAGUE IS NOW GOING THR |
|
1 |
| I PHONED UP YETERDAY ABOUT IT BUT COULD NOT TO THE PERSON I NEEDED TO SPEAK TO.I DO KNOW THAT IT CAN NOW HAVE THE MONEY DEDUCTED FROM HIS SALARY |
|
1 |
| I THINK IT MAY INCLUDE THE CSA BEING ABLE TO GET TO A MANS PAY AND MAKE DIRECT DEDUCTIONS |
|
1 |
| I THINK THAT THEY CAN NOW DEDUCT MONEY DIRECT FROM A MANS PAY |
|
1 |
| I have heard that they are a quarter of the income |
|
1 |
| I think that a father will be paying a percentage of his salary for each child with variations in percentages with the number of children. |
|
1 |
| IT IS TAKEN AS A PERCENTAGE OF TAKE HOME 15% 1ST CHILD AND ADD 5% FOR OTHERS UP TO 25%/IF FROM DIFFERENT PARTNERS, TOTAL AMOUNT DIVIDED BY AMOUNT OF KIDS AND SPLIT BETWEEN THE KIDS |
|
1 |
| New tax credit system has loopholes-these are being plugged.Ae/no. |
|
1 |
| No |
|
6 |
| No I couldnb't give details |
|
1 |
| No although I have read something in the press |
|
1 |
| No not offhand |
|
1 |
| No. |
|
1 |
| Not really no-something to do with tax credits. |
|
1 |
| SIPLIFIING THE PROCES |
|
1 |
| They're now looking at taking a percentage of the net income rather than the complicated system it was before,and they're now giving allowances for step children.Ae/no. |
|
1 |
| Try harder to get fathers to pay. |
|
1 |
| Trying to introduce new IT basis to simplify the calculation and distribution of payments. This has failed . The case backlog is now trying to be cleared manually it is a government failure it has not been handled properly. |
|
1 |
| Yes .We keep £10 of the maintenaance ourselves |
|
1 |
| a percentage of the parents income |
|
1 |
| basically its a proportion of your salary and it will take into acct over night stays and it will be made simpler |
|
1 |
| can't remember - i know it meant more money was coming out of the persons pocket |
|
1 |
| cannot recall at present |
|
1 |
| cannot remember |
|
1 |
| cant remember |
|
1 |
| change it so it's a set percentage depending on how many children there are |
|
1 |
| changed to percenctage of pay |
|
1 |
| depending on how many children a percentage is calculated |
|
1 |
| fixed proportion of contributors income per child with poss a ceiling |
|
1 |
| going to become means -tested, i think, on the men's behalf AE)- |
|
1 |
| i believe that fathers do not have to pay as much nowadays |
|
1 |
| i do know |
|
1 |
| is a %age of take holm pay, rising with the no. of children involved. |
|
1 |
| it is being reduced from thirty percent to fifteen per cent of the absent parents income |
|
1 |
| its a percentage now of earnings |
|
1 |
| its going to be the inland rev wholl pay money toawdrs kids not dss |
|
1 |
| just some forms |
|
1 |
| looking at each case more individually |
|
1 |
| make it dependent on fathers income so ammount will be variable |
|
1 |
| making the father pay more a/c to wages |
|
1 |
| more money |
|
1 |
| more money for families on lower wages |
|
1 |
| my partner works for the CSA |
|
1 |
| no |
|
45 |
| no - my partner has had a letter |
|
1 |
| no at the moment |
|
1 |
| no details |
|
1 |
| no idea |
|
1 |
| no,off-hand i can't |
|
1 |
| no. |
|
2 |
| none |
|
1 |
| not actually individually |
|
1 |
| not off hand |
|
1 |
| not really - have just heard about there being changes |
|
1 |
| not sure |
|
2 |
| only that basically they will take 20% of gross or net income not sure which// |
|
1 |
| percentage of income claimed |
|
1 |
| percentage of something but not sure |
|
1 |
| reduce how much the father has to pay and reducing it, also taking into accoun t if hes living with someone who alresdy has a child |
|
1 |
| set formula set |
|
1 |
| simplification of th system a proportion of income simpler formulae |
|
1 |
| something about the percentage being reduced |
|
1 |
| take 15% for first child ,10% for second from wages |
|
1 |
| the original csa was failure for collections the success of revised csa is unknown |
|
1 |
| there's been a lot of where the mother's not getting the money then where is and what is happening to say the interest on it/ae/no |
|
1 |
| they dont take into account new partners income |
|
1 |
| they dont take into accout mothers earnings it now goes on net income |
|
1 |
| they were going to base it on a 25% of net income, they were going to work it out for the number of children, it was going to be a decreasing scale for the number of children |
|
1 |
| think that it is a percentage of earnings instead of a set amount |
|
1 |
| tiered system depending on number of dependents - increasers up to 4 children |
|
1 |
| try and charge 15% of your net income after they have taxed you as well bring it in when they get their computer systems up to date brought change in about 3 years ago but couldnt implement them because the computer systems couldnt take it |
|
1 |
| trying to simply/make it an easier formula/proportion of income |
|
1 |
| yes as this is part of my work |
|
1 |
Login