| 99 |
|
1 |
| CAR PARKING |
|
1 |
| Disruption during construction |
|
1 |
| General disadvantage to those living in vicinity |
|
1 |
| Increase in crime |
|
1 |
| Increased crime |
|
1 |
| Local increase in the population |
|
1 |
| MORE TRAFFIC AND DISRUPTION |
|
1 |
| More emotional stress for residents near the airport |
|
1 |
| Reduction in services/water etc. |
|
1 |
| Rent costs up |
|
1 |
| Risk factor of accident |
|
1 |
| accidents |
|
1 |
| basic infrastructure not in place for expansion |
|
1 |
| bring too many people flooding to the airport, its bad enough now |
|
1 |
| bringing foreigners to the area |
|
1 |
| brings in diseases |
|
1 |
| chance of aircraft coming down in middle of farnborough. and terrorists wd probably bomb airport |
|
1 |
| chance of increase in car theft due to large number of cars being parked at airport/ |
|
1 |
| compulsary purchase of home people having to move |
|
1 |
| cost |
|
1 |
| create more crime and the negative effects of tourism |
|
1 |
| crime |
|
1 |
| damage to children |
|
1 |
| debated and discussed within the local communities |
|
1 |
| demolition of houses |
|
1 |
| dislike idea of extra freigh buildings etc being built |
|
1 |
| disruptive to people-moving houses etc |
|
1 |
| does not fly |
|
1 |
| education, crime, house prices |
|
1 |
| environmental damage |
|
1 |
| environmental problems |
|
1 |
| fear of terrorists |
|
1 |
| further to travel |
|
1 |
| greater demand on (not very good) public transport |
|
1 |
| if property had to be demolished |
|
1 |
| illegal immigrants |
|
1 |
| immigrants coming into the area |
|
1 |
| increase in eastern europeans in local area |
|
1 |
| increase of general population |
|
1 |
| increased taxes, council tax |
|
2 |
| increased traffic and people |
|
1 |
| infrastructure not in place (Water etc.) |
|
1 |
| lack of hotels |
|
1 |
| light pollution |
|
1 |
| live far enough away that it doesn't affect him |
|
1 |
| longer check in times |
|
1 |
| loss of exhibition cedntre |
|
1 |
| loss of existing road |
|
1 |
| makes people environmentally irresponsible |
|
1 |
| may knock down buildings to build |
|
1 |
| more accidents likely |
|
1 |
| more cars on roads and more water problems because they wou7ld take more of the water from the area |
|
1 |
| more crime |
|
1 |
| more global warming |
|
1 |
| more houses built |
|
1 |
| more imigrant workers taking local jobs |
|
1 |
| more night flights |
|
1 |
| more people |
|
1 |
| more planes to crash |
|
1 |
| more residents from overseas |
|
1 |
| more tourists |
|
1 |
| more tourists ! |
|
1 |
| neutral |
|
1 |
| no expansion too much at the moment |
|
1 |
| no local airport |
|
1 |
| no views |
|
1 |
| not best use of resources |
|
1 |
| over population |
|
1 |
| overcrowding of housing |
|
1 |
| people who dont have a stake in the area# |
|
1 |
| people will have to move when they have lived there all their lives |
|
1 |
| people will loose their privacy re security around airport etc |
|
1 |
| potention terrorist attacks |
|
1 |
| public transport couldn't cope |
|
1 |
| reduce the quality of peoples lives |
|
1 |
| security |
|
1 |
| security risks |
|
1 |
| shouldn*t be running so many planes |
|
1 |
| smuggling, illegal import of drugs |
|
1 |
| some people would lose their homes disruption caused |
|
1 |
| terroism |
|
1 |
| too many already |
|
1 |
| too many people using health facilities |
|
1 |
| unable to answer |
|
1 |
| upsetting local residents |
|
1 |
| volume of people |
|
1 |
| would be more of a nuisance environmentally |
|
1 |
Login