This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.

 

Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

Scottish Crime and Justice Survey, 2009-2010

Variable Details

Variableqnca
LabelQNCA: What respondent thinks should have happened to the offender as an alternative to going to court
Responses
-2 Refused 6
-1 Don't know 115
1 Been given some kind of warning 499
2 Been given a fine 95
3 Done something to help you or the community 162
4 Apologised for what they had done 402
5 Been made to pay you compensation 245
6 Been given some kind of help to stop them offending 108
7 Something else should have happened to them 31
8 Nothing should have happened to them 207
Sysmiss 2977
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationScottish Crime and Justice Survey, 2009-2010
UKRI logo

Funded by UKRI through the ESRC with contributions from our partners.

© 2025 UK Data Service
We are supported by the University of Essex, University of Manchester, Jisc, UCL and University of Edinburgh. We are funded by UKRI through the Economic and Social Research Council.