Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.
Necessary cookies
Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.
Cookies that measure website use
If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.
Address seems to be wrong but photo matches description. Valuer consulted but correct address unknown.
1
ONS says 3 bed flat of 30m2. Valuer has valued a 3 bed flat but most unlikely that property of description would be 30m2.
1
Photo does appear to match description despite discdata var value.
1
Photo does seem to match description despite discdata var value.
1
Photo is of a small bungalow, but description states 1 bed studio of of 115m2. Seems highly unlikely property in photo has this flrarea and would be closer to the VOA area of 51m2.
1
Previously valued on basis of VOA data that shows property to be a house.
1
Seems to match but area of 39m2 would not seem possible for terraced house.
1
The address of the property suggests a bedsit but descr. of 4 bed terr. Original value conducted on bedsit, revised value assumes a terraced house.
1
photo and description do seem to match despite discdata var. - only possible discrepancy os the designated bay parking but it has been looked at on google and there does seem to be bay parking surrounding the flat. VOA agree.
1
Disclaimer
Please note that these frequencies are not weighted.