This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.

 

Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

Crime Survey for England and Wales, 2012-2013

Variable Details

Variablemtyp2012
LabelMOSAIC Public Sector Type (updated 2012)
Responses
1 A01. Rural families with high incomes, often from city jobs 373
2 A02. Retirees electing to settle in environmentally attracti 528
3 A03. Remote communities with poor access to public and comme 442
4 A04. Villagers with few well paid alternatives to agricultur 456
5 B05. Better off empty nesters in low density estates on town 1088
6 B06. Self-employed trades people living in smaller communiti 1008
7 B07. Empty nester owner occupiers making little use of publi 796
8 B08. Mixed communities with many single people in the centre 473
9 C09. Successful older business leaders living in sought-afte 469
10 C10. Wealthy families in substantial houses with little comm 128
11 C11. Creative professionals seeking involvement in local com 351
12 C12. Residents in smart city centre flats who make little us 43
13 D13. Higher income older champions of village communities 848
14 D14. Older people living in large houses in mature suburbs 764
15 D15. Well off commuters living in spacious houses in semi ru 818
16 D16. Higher income families concerned with education and car 803
17 E17. Comfortably off suburban families weakly tied to their 948
18 E18. Industrial workers living comfortably in owner occupied 813
19 E19. Self reliant older families in suburban semis in indust 1186
20 E20. Upwardly mobile South Asian families living in inter wa 364
21 E21. Middle aged families living in less fashionable inter w 947
22 F22. Busy executives in town houses in dormitory settlements 534
23 F23. Early middle aged parents likely to be involved in thei 852
24 F24. Young parents new to their neighbourhood, keen to put d 565
25 F25. Personnel reliant on the Ministry of Defence for public 64
26 G26. Well educated singles living in purpose built flats 432
27 G27. City dwellers owning houses in older neighbourhoods 165
28 G28. Singles and sharers occupying converted Victorian house 147
29 G29. Young professional families settling in better quality 598
30 G30. Diverse communities of well educated singles living in 85
31 G31. Owners in smart purpose built flats in prestige locatio 271
32 G32. Students and other transient singles in multi-let house 275
33 G33. Transient singles, poorly supported by family and neigh 261
34 G34. Students involved in college and university communities 69
35 H35. Childless new owner occupiers in cramped new homes 655
36 H36. Young singles and sharers renting small purpose built f 363
37 H37. Young owners and rented developments of mixed tenure 413
38 H38. People living in brand new residential developments 73
39 I39. Young owners and private renters in inner city terraces 151
40 I40. Multi-ethnic communities in newer suburbs away from the 258
41 I41. Renters of older terraces in ethnically diverse communi 175
42 I42. South Asian communities experiencing social deprivation 252
43 I43. Older town centres terraces with transient, single popu 860
44 I44. Low income families occupying poor quality older terrac 756
45 J45. Low income communities reliant on low skill industrial 1184
46 J46. Residents in blue collar communities revitalised by com 830
47 J47. Comfortably off industrial workers owning their own hom 947
48 K48. Middle aged couples and families in right-to-buy homes 620
49 K49. Low income older couples long established in former cou 601
50 K50. Older families in low value housing in traditional indu 1251
51 K51. Often indebted families living in low rise estates 863
52 L52. Communities of wealthy older people living in large sea 222
53 L53. Residents in retirement, second home and tourist commun 342
54 L54. Retired people of modest means commonly living in seasi 730
55 L55. Capable older people leasing / owning flats in purpose 375
56 M56. Older people living on social housing estates with limi 640
57 M57. Old people in flats subsisting on welfare payments 339
58 M58. Less mobile older people requiring a degree of care 257
59 M59. People living in social accommodation designed for olde 360
60 N60. Tenants in social housing flats on estates at risk of s 142
61 N61. Childless tenants in social housing flats with modest s 470
62 N62. Young renters in flats with a cosmopolitan mix 187
63 N63. Multicultural tenants renting flats in areas of social 193
64 N64. Diverse homesharers renting small flats in densely popu 184
65 N65. Young singles in multi-ethnic communities, many in high 166
66 N66. Childless, low income tenants in high rise flats 99
67 O67. Older tenants on low rise social housing estates where 823
68 O68. Families with varied structures living on low rise soci 422
69 O69. Vulnerable young parents needing substantial state supp 713
99 Unclassified 0
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationCrime Survey for England and Wales, 2012-2013
UKRI logo

Funded by UKRI through the ESRC with contributions from our partners.

© 2024 UK Data Service
We are supported by the University of Essex, University of Manchester, Jisc, UCL and University of Edinburgh. We are funded by UKRI through the Economic and Social Research Council.