This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.

 

Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

British Election Study, 2010: Campaign Internet Data

Variable Details

Variableaaq105
LabelCut Taxes-Spend More-Labour
Question text Using the 0 to 10 scale below, where the end marked 0 means that government should <i>cut taxes a lot and spend much less on health and social services</i>, and the end marked 10 means that government should <i>raise taxes a lot and spend much more on health and social services</i>, where would you place <i>the Labour Party</i> on this scale?
Responses
0 0-Cut taxes 466
1 1 177
2 2 478
3 3 721
4 4 1148
5 5 4147
6 6 2341
7 7 2212
8 8 1590
9 9 624
10 10-Increase taxes 1131
12 DK 1781
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationBritish Election Study, 2010: Campaign Internet Data
UniverseElectors resident in Great Britain during 2010.;National
SamplingMulti-stage stratified random sample;See documentation for details.
Study TypeLongitudinal/panel/cohort; The study contains pre-election, during election, and post-election survey waves.
UKRI logo

Funded by UKRI through the ESRC with contributions from our partners.

© 2024 UK Data Service
We are supported by the University of Essex, University of Manchester, Jisc, UCL and University of Edinburgh. We are funded by UKRI through the Economic and Social Research Council.