This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.

 

Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium Panel Survey, 2012-2015

Variable Details

VariableK6_B
LabelWhy didn't the seed money for revolving fund improve livelihood?
Responses
1 It wasn't what we needed 7
2 It came too late 4
3 It was poor quality 0
4 Other 0
Sysmiss 6020
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationSecure Livelihoods Research Consortium Panel Survey, 2012-2015
UKRI logo

Funded by UKRI through the ESRC with contributions from our partners.

© 2025 UK Data Service
We are supported by the University of Essex, University of Manchester, Jisc, UCL and University of Edinburgh. We are funded by UKRI through the Economic and Social Research Council.