This site uses cookies

Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information please check our Cookie notice.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. This website cannot function properly without these cookies.

Cookies that measure website use

If you provide permission, we will use Google Analytics to measure how you use the website so we can improve it based on our understanding of user needs. Google Analytics sets cookies that store anonymised information about how you got to the site, the pages you visit, how long you spend on each page and what you click on while you're visiting the site.

 

Variable

UK Data Service variable record for:

The Islington Crime Survey: Thirty Years On, 2016

Variable Details

VariableVB1_16G
LabelHow (if at all) could the burglary have been prevented? Other (please specify)
Responses
0 - 77
1 Not preventable 0
2 If security measures better 0
3 If someone had been at home 0
4 If we had been more security conscious (eg locked doors or w 0
5 If neighbours had been more vigilant 0
6 If more police on the streets 0
7 Other (please specify) 4
95 Not answered 0
97 Dont know 2
98 Refused 0
99 Not asked 1942
DisclaimerPlease note that these frequencies are not weighted.
LocationThe Islington Crime Survey: Thirty Years On, 2016
UKRI logo

Funded by UKRI through the ESRC with contributions from our partners.

© 2025 UK Data Service
We are supported by the University of Essex, University of Manchester, Jisc, UCL and University of Edinburgh. We are funded by UKRI through the Economic and Social Research Council.