Because you need to carry fuel to it and the older you get the less capable of carrying the fuel |
|
1 |
Don't Know |
|
2 |
Hard work for type of property also storage problems. Disposal of ashes. Not practical, sadly |
|
1 |
I use a multi use stove that heats the house, and i like an open fire |
|
1 |
already installed new boiler |
|
1 |
at the time we were building the house biomass was fairly new - unproven, so wasn't confident |
|
1 |
because of the upheaval |
|
1 |
can't remember |
|
1 |
cost |
|
6 |
cost at time |
|
1 |
cost too much |
|
1 |
cost too much old house solid fuel better |
|
1 |
cst |
|
1 |
disagree with them not ecollogically sound tax payers subsidise it and think its very bad. Wood chip imported from united states is wrong |
|
1 |
do not think they are as green as they say they are. |
|
1 |
dont need it |
|
1 |
dont think they work very well |
|
1 |
expense |
|
1 |
expense at my age |
|
1 |
gas cheaper |
|
1 |
hassle |
|
1 |
lack of space i would lose an entire wall |
|
1 |
m not sure i could fuel it/not cost effective dont know how long it would take to get money back |
|
1 |
neighbour has one and don't like the smell coming from it. When wind in wron g direction quite choking and acrid . |
|
1 |
not cost effective |
|
1 |
not economic |
|
1 |
not possible |
|
1 |
old house with pre existing oil system--too expensive to roip out and start again |
|
1 |
overall cost |
|
1 |
security of fuel supply and convenience of fuelling |
|
1 |
the configuration of house i.e. ventilation |
|
1 |
the initial expense to install, not practical, hasn't really taken off in Shetland |
|
1 |
too expensive |
|
1 |
too expensive to run |
|
1 |
too much hassle |
|
1 |
too nlong to get money back |
|
1 |
too old and costly |
|
1 |
upheaval of everything |
|
1 |