UK Data Service data catalogue record for:
|Title:||National Child Development Study: Sweeps 1-6, 1958-2000, Self-Reported Measures|
|Alternative title:||Derived Measures from the National Child Development Study and 1958 British Birth Cohort: Self-Reported Measures; NCDS|
|Depositor:||Goodwin, L., Queen Mary, University of London. Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry. Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine|
Goodwin, L., Queen Mary, University of London. Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry. Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
Clark, C., Queen Mary, University of London. Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry. Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
Medical Research Council
|Other acknowledgements:||The depositors would like to thank Jon Johnson, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education for his helpful assistance with the data, and all of the investigators on this project: Professor Peter D. White (Queen Mary University of London), Professor Matthew Hotopf (Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London), and Professor Stephen Stansfeld (Queen Mary University of London).|
The citation for this study is:
Select the text above to add data citation in your outputs.
Select citation format:
|XML citation formats: CSL EndNote|
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.National Child Development Study: Sweeps 1-6, 1958-2000, Self-Reported Measures includes derived variables that were developed as part of a research study examining risk and preventive factors for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in the National Child Development Study (NCDS) (available from the UK Data Archive under GN 33004). Data on the outcome measures was assessed in 1999-2000 during Sweep 6 of data collection, at which point the cohort members were aged 42 years. The study examines a number of life course risk markers for CFS/ME and IBS including childhood adversity, childhood illness, physical activity and psychopathology in childhood and adulthood.
The data can be linked to the main NCDS data. Users are advised to also consult the main NCDS documentation which is available for individual Sweeps of the NCDS under 33004.
The study includes the following measures:
|Time period:||1958 - 2000|
|Dates of fieldwork:||June 2008 - May 2010|
No spatial unit
|Kind of data:||
Individual (micro) level
Respondents to main NCDS in Great Britain, Sweeps 1-6, 1958-2000.
The NCDS is an ongoing study. This study includes data from Sweeps 1-6 and outcome measures collected at Sweep 6.
No sampling (total universe)
|Number of units:||18,558 cases|
|Method of data collection:||
Compilation or synthesis of existing material
|Weighting:||No weighting used|
This study uses data from Sweeps 1-6 of the NCDS (available from the UK Data Archive under GN 33004).
|BACTERIAL AND VIRUS DISEASES||BRONCHITIS||CEREBRAL PALSY|
|EPILEPSY||FATIGUE (PHYSIOLOGY)||GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS|
|HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS||ILL HEALTH||INDOOR SPORTS|
|PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES||PNEUMONIA||RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASES|
|Date of release:|
|First edition:||04 May 2011|
|Copyright:||Copyright L. Goodwin and Centre for Longitudinal Studies|
The depositor has specified that registration is required and standard conditions of use apply. The depositor may be informed about usage.
Additional special conditions of use also apply. See terms and conditions of access for further information.
|Availability:||UK Data Service|
|Contact:||Get in touch|
|Title||File Name||Size (KB)|
|Study information and citation||UKDA_Study_6760_Information.htm||6|
By principal investigator(s):
Goodwin, L., White, P.D., Hotopf, M., Stansfeld, S.A. and Clark, C. (2011) 'Predictors of CFS/ME in the 1958 British Birth Cohort: a replication study of the 1946 and 1970 cohorts', Annals of Epidemiology, 21(5), pp.343-350.
Clark, C., Goodwin, L., White, P.D., Hotopf, M. and Stansfeld, S.A. (2011) 'What are the risk markers and preventive factors for chronic fatigue in the 1958 British Birth Cohort?' British Journal of Psychiatry.
Resulting from secondary analysis: